CSPIscam Home Page


The Biggest Delusion In The History Of Preventive Medicine? (2/3/12)
According to two top medical researchers, the hype behind the wild claims of the “sodium police” isn’t, well, worth its salt. Salt is routinely demonized in the media, by regulators, and activist groups like the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI), which has called salt “the deadly white powder you already snort.” In the past year, though, we’ve seen salt vindicated time and time again through scientific research. The food police and nanny-state regulators now seemingly want to double down with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the USDA’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) asking for public...
read more...


Publicity Hound Physician: Require ID For Soda (2/2/12)
“I'm actually trying to undo the nanny state.” Coming as it did from a public health researcher, that sounds like a breath of fresh air, right? Has Kelly Brownell met his professorial arch-nemesis? Sadly, no. That is in fact the Orwellian musing of Dr. Robert Lustig, whose new commentary in the journal Nature calls for, among other draconian infringements on personal choice, massive taxes on sugar-containing foods, laws to restrict the amount of sugar in food, and even carding people who buy soda. What’s all...
read more...


New Nature Comment Piece Sour On Sugar (2/1/12)
Center for Consumer Freedom Responds to Authors’ Absurd Call to Treat Sugar Like Alcohol and Tobacco Today, the nonprofit Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) is firing back against a Comment piece published in this week’s edition of Nature by Robert Lustig, Laura Schmidt, and Claire Brindis that calls for strict regulations and high taxes on products containing sugar. The authors argue that sugar is “toxic” to our health and should thus be regulated like alcohol or tobacco. Lustig and his co-authors put forward laughable suggestions such as...
read more...


Soda Taxes Are Ineffective, Outdated (1/30/12)
As expected, the new year brought a new push from do-gooder public health activists intent on taxing soft drinks. In Oregon, advocates proposed a ballot initiative to place a penny-per-ounce wholesale tax on sugary soft drinks. A Portland physician modeled the measure after a 2009 proposal by Kelly “Twinkie Tax” Brownell from Yale University’s Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity, which endorsed the tax as a way to combat childhood obesity. However, The Oregonian - the largest paper in the state - is skeptical that the tax could slim down residents, and an NPR food blogger also questions the real-world effects of such a tax. The...
read more...



CSPI's Acrylamide Scare
Learn about the willful manipulations and junk science calculations that CSPI used in its petition to the FDA over acrylamide in food. The Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF) submitted a reply brief to the FDA, detailing how CSPI arbitrarily “adjusted” government statistics and made faulty assumptions about the minimal risk to consumers from dietary acrylamide.

» Click here to download the PDF of the full brief.


The Truth About CSPI
The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) and its founder, Michael F. Jacobson, are not as nice, sweet, and unbiased as CSPI's name might imply. The group routinely uses scare tactics justified by "junk science" and media theatrics as part of their ceaseless campaign for government regulation of your personal food choices.

Jacobson once said: "CSPI is proud of finding something wrong with practically everything." As you can see from this site, they have.


CSPI's Background
To get more detailed information on CSPI, their officers, funding and programs, check out our sister site at Activistcash.com
Visit ActivistCash


A Humorous Look At Labels
The food police at the Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) have a thing for labels. CSPI's zealots never met a food label they didn't like -- until now. Food cop, label thyself.


Copyright © 1997 - 2012 Center For Consumer Freedom. All Rights Reserved.